|  | 
          
            | Wildlife Bridges
  
    | RSPB Spotlight on Badgers book |  |  
    | James 
	  Lowen explores the lives of badgers and their communal 
	  living, feeding habits and threats to their conservation. Click
      here to buy: Paperback edition
   Kindle edition
   |  
                
                  | 
				 Most people will be familiar with the narrow concrete 
				footbridges and the concrete cattle bridges
              which cross some of our rural motorways. Sometimes these allow a farmer to
              move cattle across a motorway, without the need for the use of
              trucks and trailers. Cattle bridges can be fairly narrow, concrete
              affairs; as the cattle are herded by the farmer, and forced across
              together; and are more than happy to walk along in a tight group. At other times they are used as narrow concrete footpaths and 
				horse-riding trails. |  
                  | A more recent concept is to build so-called wildlife bridges to
              act as a cross-over point for the motorway or a railway line.
              Whilst a traditional cattle bridge might only be 2 or 3 metres
              wide, a wildlife bridge might be as wide as 20 or 30 or 40 metres or
              even wider. The top of
              the bridge will be a truly green space, complete with grass and
              meadows and shrubs and perhaps even a few small trees. So far as
              the car or train driver is concerned, he or she is passing through
              a short tunnel. So far as the wildlife is concerned, they appear to be
              walking or running across a solid area of safe ground. They are
              less spooked by traffic noise from below; and, perhaps just as importantly, less
              pressured by other animals or prey species as they can maintain a larger separation
              distance between themselves. |  
                  | One example of why this is important is that hedgehogs may be in
              fear of their lives from badgers; and will avoid badgers as much
              as they can. If a badger has marked its territory within the past
              3 hours or so, the hedgehog will tend to avoid the area. If a
              wildlife bridge was very narrow, this may well mean that the
              hedgehogs were always too frightened to cross the bridge; which
              might well have a seriously adverse effect on territorial
              boundaries and wildlife survival rates - especially where cubs and 
				prey species are
              involved. |  
                  |  If the wildlife bridge is very wide, a frightened hedgehog may
              well be able to cross the bridge on one side, and a scary badger
              on the other side; and each species live in comfortable harmony with one
              another.
 |  
                  | 
				 A wide wildlife bridge is also much safer in terms of accident
              reduction, as you can be fairly certain that wildlife will not be
              on the carriageway; as you can fence them out; and they have a
              safe easy route to use instead which looks just like any other bit
              of countryside to them. Because the wildlife bridge goes over a motorway or a railway
              line, it is obviously much higher up, meaning that there is very
              little chance of flooding; and the possibility of catastrophic
              pollution damage (such as salt-water run-off or oil-spills) is much reduced. |  
                  |  It is not beyond the bounds of
              possibility that wildlife tunnels might become polluted with oil
              or chemicals spills; or with the unpleasant "run-off"
              water that washes off major roads. Such run-off water often has damaging levels of
              oil and petro-chemicals; and, in winter, may have very
              high concentrations of road-salt and grit. Whilst water run-off
              may be dealt with by drainage or the double-ditching technique;
              this is not always good enough in flood-prone areas and tunnels
              may be at risk of flooding or pollution. |  
                  | 
				 In many circumstances the additional effort required to make a
              wildlife bridge (rather than an enormous cutting may not be hugely
              significant in terms of the overall cost of the project.
              Traditionally the materials dug out of the ground to form the deep
              cutting may have been trucked away. With the wildlife bridge, they
              can simply be reinstated once the tunnel roofing system has been
              put in place. This technique, known as back-filling, was used when
              the canals were first being constructed; and has since been used
              for railway construction too. |  
                  | As well as these wide wildlife
              bridges allowing animal territories to be maintained, rather than
              being divided into smaller, less viable islands; they also have
              ancillary effects for the wider countryside. They do provide a
              small amount of recompense for the monstrous damage done by laying all that
              concrete and tarmac; and they may well be less intrusive in terms
              of traffic noise, visual amenity than an enormous great steep-side
              cutting. After all, a cutting will  always look like an ugly
              cutting with a strip of concrete in the bottom. At least a
              wildlife bridge will look like a bit of green countryside with a
              tunnel underneath! 
 |  |  |