www.badgerland.co.uk
Fact-based scientifically-accurate educational information about Badgers
Home Shop Animals Pictures Help Seeing Groups Education News Search Books
Teaching Age 3-7 Age 8-11 Age 12-16 Age 17+ Poems Stories Politics Research Journals
 

Ziram-treated maize and free-ranging badgers

Badgerland online shop

Badger by Tim Roper Collins New Naturalist Library (114) - Badger
This reference work is packed with detail about the badger - great for studious readers - there is no better book in print.  Click here to buy:
Paperback edition or Hardback edition
Kindle edition

 

Journal

Applied Animal Behaviour Science - Volume 93, Issues 3-4 , September 2005, Pages 309-321

Authors

Sandra E. Baker, Stephen A. Ellwood, Richard W. Watkins and David W. Macdonald

Abstract

There are increasing demands for non-lethal methods of resolving foraging conflict between people and a wide range of wildlife species. Badgers make good models for studying human–wildlife conflict resolution, and they epitomise the circumstances driving research in this field; they cause millions of pounds worth of crop damage each year in England and Wales, and yet they are protected legally from culling. In anticipation of future field conditioning trials, we set out here to identify the minimum concentration of the repellent ziram for inhibiting badger damage to maize. We believe this to be the first study to investigate the dose-dependent effects of a repellent on a wild free-ranging population of mammals. We adapted a multi-choice design to test the acceptability to free-ranging badgers of maize cobs treated topically with a range of ziram concentrations (0–5.3% (w/w)). We used video surveillance to obtain detailed behavioural observations of individually identifiable animals. The seven badgers that ate maize during the trial did not discriminate between treatments on the first night on which they fed. However, on subsequent nights, most of these badgers either failed to return to experimental sites or returned without feeding. These animals may have developed learned aversions to ziram after a single night's exposure. Two individuals visited and fed throughout the study, and demonstrated a clear negative dose-dependent response that reached a plateau at a ziram concentration of 1.3% (w/w). This effect was evident in both individual behavioural data and the proportion of cobs suffering badger damage. Our aim was to identify an optimal (threshold) concentration of ziram for deterring badger feeding on maize; we conclude that maize cobs should be treated at approximately 1.3–1.5% (w/w), by topical application of a 10% (w/v) ziram paste. A field experiment of similar design could provide a model starting point for research with other species, repellents and food substrates.

Keywords

Badgers; Crop damage; Dose–response trial; Non-lethal control; Repellent; Ziram

Web site